Environmental protection: Huge group of substances threatened with ban

Et is a hitherto unique initiative: A group of chemicals with an estimated number of more than 10,000 individual substances is to be largely banned in the EU. The substances can be found in everyday objects such as anoraks, pans and cosmetics. But they are also part of industrial processes and technical applications.

The extremely broad ban is also special because only relatively few of the substances have actually been directly proven to pose a risk. Because of the enormous variety of compounds, the majority of the substances have not yet been investigated at all. So the ban is a kind of precautionary measure. The thought behind this: if some of the substances are proven to be harmful, many other, previously untested representatives of the substance group could also be.

The initiators say the basic ban is necessary to protect human health and the environment, where the extremely persistent chemicals continue to accumulate. The industry, however, considers the step to be disproportionate.

The planned ban concerns the group of substances known as per- and polyfluorinated alkyl compounds (PFAS). These chemicals do not occur naturally in the environment, so they are all man-made.

also read

Roughly speaking, the PFAS (pronounced pifas) have in common that at the molecular level they consist of more or less long carbon chains (this is what the syllable “alkyl-” refers to), in which hydrogen atoms are wholly (per-) or partially (poly -) are replaced by fluorine atoms (-fluorinated).

PFAS are also known as forever chemicals because they accumulate in the environment and break down very slowly. “Depending on the substance, they last for several decades to centuries in the environment,” said Wiebke Drost, PFAS expert at the Federal Environment Agency (Uba). The Uba is significantly involved in the ban initiative.

Due to their unique characteristics, PFAS are used today in a large number of mainly industrial products, as the Federation of German Industries writes in a position paper from 2021. The substances are chemically stable, and they don’t mind even high temperatures. In addition, they have a very low surface tension and are therefore both oil and water-repellent. Furthermore, they are considered to be very resilient and have a high abrasion and wear resistance.

PFAS in everyday products such as pans

PFAS have a very wide range of applications. They are found in everyday products such as cosmetics, rain jackets and pan coatings. But they also play a major role in industrial processes. The BDI names 12 sectors that would be affected by a ban. These include semiconductor production, the manufacture of lithium-ion batteries and fuel cells, the automotive and electrical industry, the textile industry and mechanical and plant engineering.

See also  Please do not pet - Wild pets (4): - Video

According to Uba, PFAS can get into soil and water through the exhaust air from industrial plants, for example. According to research by the “Süddeutsche Zeitung”, NDR and WDR, PFAS can be detected at more than 1,500 locations in Germany.

Since PFAS are also contained in everyday products, they also occur in indoor air. Some PFAS find their way into rivers, lakes and seas via sewage treatment plants. They reach remote areas via the air and the water of the rivers and oceans. For example, the fabrics can already be found at the Poles.

More about toxic substances

Last year, a study found that PFAS can be detected in rainwater in even the most remote regions of the world — at levels many times higher than US Environmental Protection Agency thresholds. “With the absorption of PFAS from contaminated soil and water in plants and the accumulation in fish, these substances are also absorbed into the human food chain,” writes the Uba. Humans can also ingest PFAS through the air and drinking water.

Some PFAS are already largely banned because they are considered dangerous. “Of the relatively few well-studied PFAS, most are considered to be moderately to highly toxic, particularly to child development,” writes the European Environment Agency (EEA). A total of around a dozen individual substances or small groups of substances are regulated. The best known of these are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS).

Studies have suggested that PFOS⁠ and ⁠PFOA⁠ can, among other things, cause a reduced antibody response to vaccinations, writes the Uba on its website. In addition, there are “clear indications” of a connection to increased serum levels of cholesterol. Elevated cholesterol levels are considered a risk factor for Heart attack and stroke. According to the EEA, PFOA and PFOS are also associated with liver damage, as well as kidney and testicular cancer connected. Negative effects on animals and plants are also assumed.

See also  Why do people buy things they don't need?

“Indicates that other PFAS are also dangerous”

It is not known how the vast majority of PFAS affect people and the environment. However, many experts assume that at least part of it has negative properties. “There are indications that other PFAS are also dangerous,” says Uba expert Drost. She sees the need to act quickly. “If we wait until the toxicity of each individual substance has been proven, it may be too late.” Ultimately, the PFAS accumulate in the environment and are difficult or impossible to get out of there.

One problem so far: If a single substance is banned, the industry can replace it with a similar, not yet regulated substance. However, these can be just as dangerous or even more dangerous than the original substance. Experts then speak of regrettable substitution.

Therefore authorities from Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway and Sweden have proposed to ban the production, use and placing on the market of PFAS almost completely. According to both supporters and opponents, such a ban would be an unprecedented process because thousands of individual substances and all their applications would be affected. From Germany, the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) and Uba are involved.

also read

Not Real News

The BAuA writes that the proposal provides for transitional periods of one and a half to thirteen and a half years, depending on the application. Unlimited exceptions are provided for a few areas. “This applies, for example, to active ingredients in plant protection products, biocidal products and human and veterinary medicinal products.”

A total ban would pose major challenges for the industry. “Nobody is really relaxed at the moment,” said Mirjam Merz, an expert on chemicals policy and hazardous substances law at the BDI, the dpa. PFAS are irreplaceable for some technologies. For example, extremely stable plant components such as seals are required for many industrial processes. There are currently no alternatives for semiconductors, lithium-ion batteries or fuel cells either. “There seems to be little understanding for the problems in the industry,” complains Merz. In addition, it is unclear what a total ban for consumers means, after all PFAS are indispensable in every mobile phone and every car.

PFAS: What’s the worst that could happen?

The BDI does see that individual substances are toxic and need to be regulated. “It is correct to react where there is a risk,” says Merz. From the BDI’s point of view, a complete ban would go too far, since many applications that pose no risk at all would then also be prohibited. “As a compromise, it could be discussed to form smaller substance groups of PFAS and to test their toxicity based on a typical representative. On that basis, that subset could then be regulated—or not.”

What’s the worst that could happen? “I assume that the effects of the restriction would be significant for many branches of industry,” says Merz. The industries are currently still examining what significance a broad ban on PFAS would have in detail. “Some of the companies don’t yet know to what extent they are affected,” says Merz. In the case of delivered products, it may not even state whether or which PFAS are contained. “That makes it particularly difficult for companies.”

If the application meets all the formalities, public consultations are scheduled to start on March 22nd. Six months are planned for this process. Industry representatives, for example, can campaign for exceptions. “The BDI is calling on its companies to take part,” says Merz. Uba representative Drost considers it “difficult to assess” whether the proposals for a total ban may be softened. She says that the transition periods could become both more relaxed and stricter.

With the help of the consultations, two different committees of the European Chemicals Agency get an idea and formulate recommendations. The Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) focuses more on the risks for people and nature, the Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) more on the benefits and costs for society. The final decision is made by the European Commission together with the EU member states. According to the BAuA, a decision can be expected in 2025.

You can listen to our WELT podcasts here

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is required, since the providers of the embedded content as third-party providers require this consent [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and via privacy at the bottom of the page.

“Aha! Ten minutes of everyday knowledge” is WELT’s knowledge podcast. Every Tuesday and Thursday we answer everyday questions from the field of science. Subscribe to the podcast at Spotify, Apple Podcasts, deezer, Amazon Music or directly via RSS feed.

See more here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *